No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
*This resource has been tested for appropriateness in the classroom and scrutinised for safeguarding and cybersecurity issues. However, please do carry out any due diligence processes required by your own institution before using or recommending it to others.
*This is an example of a resource that is under development and may not have been fully vetted for security, safety or ethics.  Please carry out your own safeguarding and cybersecurity due diligence before using it with students or recommending it to others.

Culinary Mastery Unveiled: AI-Enhanced Self-Evaluation and Rigorous Rubric Assessment

No items found.
Key Stage 3
Key Stage 4
Food Technology
Case Study
No items found.
No items found.
Matt Jones

Food Preparation and Nutrition Teacher, Kings International College

In a Surrey secondary school, a Year 9 Food Preparation and Nutrition teacher embraced AI to streamline the evaluation process for student-made stir fry. Utilising AI, an 8-question feedback form was tailored with insightful hints for self-reflection. Seeking efficient marking, the teacher adopted a rubric, intricately designed by AI, offering five levels of evaluation criteria: Incomplete, Needs Improvement, Average, Good, and Excellent. The integration of AI not only expedited assessment but also provided a comprehensive framework for culinary growth.

In the dynamic setting of a Surrey secondary school, a Food Preparation and Nutrition teacher in Year 9 embarked on a mission to elevate culinary education through the integration of AI-driven tools. The teacher recognised the potential of AI to streamline the evaluation process for student-created stir fry dishes, while also fostering self-reflection and growth among the aspiring chefs.

To begin, the teacher utilised an AI language model, to craft an 8-question feedback form tailored specifically to the stir fry assignment. Each question was meticulously designed to guide students through a thoughtful reflection on their ingredient choices, cooking techniques, and overall success in creating their dishes. The AI-generated questions included subtle hints and prompts to encourage students to delve deeper into their culinary experiences and identify areas for improvement.

Recognising the importance of efficient and consistent marking, the teacher sought AI's assistance in developing an optimal assessment strategy. The AI model proposed the creation of a rubric that offered five distinct levels of evaluation criteria: Incomplete, Needs Improvement, Average, Good, and Excellent. This structured scoring guide provided a comprehensive framework for assessing various aspects of each student's stir fry, ensuring a thorough and fair evaluation process.

The rubric encompassed key criteria such as flavour profile, texture, presentation, adherence to instructions, and creativity. Each criterion was carefully defined and aligned with the five levels of evaluation, allowing for a nuanced assessment that considered both fundamental culinary skills and advanced techniques. The AI-generated rubric served as a valuable tool for the teacher, enabling quick and accurate grading while providing students with clear benchmarks for success.

As students embarked on their self-evaluation journey using the AI-crafted feedback form, the teacher seamlessly navigated the marking process using the rubric. The well-defined levels of evaluation provided clear guidelines, allowing for a swift and comprehensive assessment of each dish. This not only expedited the grading process but also offered valuable insights into the strengths and areas for improvement for each student.

The rubric, a testament to AI-driven precision, ensured a standardised and equitable evaluation process. Students received targeted feedback aligned with specific criteria, fostering a deeper understanding of their culinary skills and promoting continuous growth. The AI-generated rubric eliminated subjectivity and bias, creating a level playing field for all students to showcase their culinary prowess.

The scenario in this case study is genuine and based upon real events and data, however its narration has been crafted by AI to uphold a standardised and clear format for readers.

Key Learning

AI-crafted self-evaluation forms promote deep reflection and self-awareness among students.

Rubrics with well-defined levels of evaluation criteria ensure consistent and fair assessment.

AI integration streamlines the marking process, saving time and providing targeted feedback.


Over-reliance on AI may diminish the value of human intuition and expertise in culinary education.

Automated assessment may overlook nuanced aspects of culinary creativity and innovation.

Excessive dependence on AI-generated rubrics may limit the flexibility to adapt to individual student needs.